MBG (Makan Bergizi Gratis) sebagai Instrumen Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Lokal: Analisis Model SPPG dan Tantangan Tata Kelola Publik

Authors

  • Saepuloh Saepuloh Persatuan Guru Nahdlatul Ulama (Pergunu) Jawa Barat, Indonesia
  • Fuad Hilmi UIN Sunan Gunung Djati, Kota Bandung, Jawa Barat, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59966/ekalaya.v4i1.2466

Keywords:

Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG), Local Economic Development, Good Governance, Policy Oversight, SPPG

Abstract

This article examines the Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) as a hybrid public policy instrument that integrates social nutrition intervention with local economic empowerment. The study focuses on analyzing the role and operational mechanism of the Nutrition Service Unit (SPPG) in stimulating local economic ecosystems, identifying governance challenges emerging in its implementation, and formulating strategies to strengthen oversight systems to ensure sustainability and accountability. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach through policy analysis, this research analyzes official policy documents, including the Decree of the Head of the National Nutrition Agency No. 244 of 2025, supported by relevant literature on Local Economic Development and Good Governance. The findings indicate that SPPG functions not only as a food distribution mechanism but also as a fiscal stimulus capable of generating local multiplier effects through partnerships with farmers, livestock producers, and food MSMEs. However, governance challenges such as limited digital monitoring integration, potential conflicts of interest, and performance-based audit constraints may weaken program effectiveness. The study proposes an integrated economic–oversight model to enhance transparency, accountability, and long-term structural impact.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-31

How to Cite

Saepuloh, S., & Hilmi, F. (2026). MBG (Makan Bergizi Gratis) sebagai Instrumen Pemberdayaan Ekonomi Lokal: Analisis Model SPPG dan Tantangan Tata Kelola Publik. EKALAYA : Jurnal Ekonomi Akuntansi, 4(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.59966/ekalaya.v4i1.2466

Issue

Section

##section.default.title##