Konflik Hukum Dalam Proyek Konstruksi Antara Wanprestasi Dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59966/yudhistira.v3i3.2006Keywords:
Breach of contract, Construction contract, Unlawful actAbstract
Construction contract conflicts often arise due to default and unlawful acts that cause losses to the parties, so a legal analysis is needed to strengthen legal certainty and justice. This study examines the issue of breach of contract and unlawful acts in construction contracts through a legal analysis of two court decisions: Decision Number 433/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst and Decision Number 46/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bgr. These two cases illustrate two forms of legal violations in the implementation of construction contracts that result in losses for both the service provider and the service user. In the first case, the breach occurred due to the debtor's negligence in fulfilling the agreed-upon performance, resulting in a claim for compensation. In the second case, the violation of the initial agreement led to delays in work completion, which then resulted in the provider being blacklisted and the contract termination by the service user. This study highlights the importance of contractual understanding, strengthening construction regulations, and effective dispute resolution mechanisms in preventing similar conflicts in the future. This study also emphasizes that work delays are not always the fault of the service provider but can be caused by changes on the part of the service user without an official extension. Therefore, efforts to improve the construction contractual system need to be strengthened to ensure legal certainty, justice, and efficiency in the implementation of construction projects in Indonesia.
References
Badri, S., Handayani, P., & Rizki, T. A. (2024). Ganti rugi terhadap perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi dalam sistem hukum perdata. USM Law Review, 7(2), 974–985.
Fitriani, S. (2023). Dampak blacklist terhadap kontraktor: Perspektif hukum administrasi dan kontrak. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 15(2), 230–245.
Ilma, D. A. U., Fitriyanti, F., & Ma’arif, F. (2020). State of the art perselisihan kontrak konstruksi di Indonesia. INERSIA, XV(1), 58–70.
Indahwati, A. N., Sami’an, S., & Hardjomuljadi, S. (2025). Arbitration in resolving construction cost claim disputes due to time extensions. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 388–?. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v6i2.388
Le, T. T. H., & Trinh, M. (2024). Political economy of Indonesia's local government policy on infrastructure development. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 17(2), 178–197. https://doi.org/10.1177/20578911241260442
Mahkamah Agung RI. (2018). Putusan Nomor 46/Pdt.G/2018/PN Bogor [putusan pengadilan negeri]. Diakses dari Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung.
Muhtar, M. I., Pratama, A. Y., Asha, W. D., & Jayanti, K. D. (2024). Analisis Putusan Kasus Wanprestasi (Studi Putusan No. 650/Pdt.G/2021/PN Jkt.Pst.). Diponegoro Private Law Review, 8(1), 81–97. https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/dplr/article/view/18919
Nurmiyanto, A., Siswoyo, E., & Hakim, L. (2023). Water infrastructure in ancient city of Trowulan, Majapahit: A lesson from the past for planning a new capital city of Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Engineering, Universitas Islam Indonesia.
Qadri, Q., et al. (2025). Requirements for overhead cost claims in Indonesian construction contracts. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 435–448.
Sudarmo, S., Febrianty, Y., Putri, V. S., Muhtar, M. H., & Salahuddin, S. (2025). Critical study of the implementation of the right of self determination in protecting Indonesia’s environmental and economic sovereignty. E3S Web of Conferences, 611, 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202561105002
Syarif, M., Ramadhani, R., Graha, M. A. W., Yanuaria, T., Muhtar, M. H., Asmah, N., Syahril, M. A. F., Utami, R. D., Rustan, A., Nasution, H. S., Putera, A., Wilhelmus, K., & Jannah, M. (2024). Metode penelitian hukum (ISBN 978-623-125-224-1). GET Press Indonesia.
