Pengaruh Religious Maturity (Kedewasaan Beragama) Terhadap Sikap Toleransi Masyarakat Muslim di Kota Depok
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59966/setyaki.v3i2.1768Keywords:
Religious Maturity, Tolerance Attitude, Muslim CommunityAbstract
This study aims to examine the influence of religious maturity on the tolerance attitudes of the Muslim community in Depok City. Employing a mixed methods approach with a sequential explanatory design, quantitative data were collected through a survey of 384 respondents, while qualitative data were obtained through interviews and focus group discussions (FGDs). Statistical analysis revealed a significant positive correlation between religious maturity and tolerance attitudes (r = 0.573, p < 0.001). Simple linear regression showed that 32.9% of the variance in tolerance attitudes was explained by religious maturity (R² = 0.329), while multiple regression analysis identified the intellectual, consequential, and experiential dimensions as significant predictors. Moderation analysis indicated that education level, age, and religious affiliation strengthened the relationship, whereas gender had no significant effect. Qualitative findings identified four patterns of the relationship between religious maturity and tolerance, as well as various influencing factors, including education, socio-cultural context, media, and family. This study underscores the importance of fostering a comprehensive and transformative religious maturity to cultivate tolerant attitudes in a multicultural society. The findings are expected to serve as a foundation for developing inclusive policies based on universal religious values.
References
Abdullah, M. A. (2022). Peran Tokoh Agama dalam Moderasi Beragama di Perkotaan. FKUB Kota Depok.
Allport, G. W. (1950). The Individual and His Religion: A Psychological Interpretation. Macmillan.
Arifinsyah, Andy, S., & Damanik, A. (2020). The Urgency of Religious Moderation in Preventing Radicalism in Indonesia. ESENSIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Ushuluddin, 21(1), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.14421/esensia.v21i1.2198
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.
Curran, J. E. (2018). That suggestion: Catholic casuistry, complexity, and Macbeth. MDPI Religions, 9(10), 98–99. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel9100315
Desky, H., & Rijal, S. (2021). Developing Multicultural Society via Religious Approach. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 20, 45–52.
Dudley, R. L., & Cruise, R. J. (1990). Religious Maturity Scale. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 18(2), 172–181.
Fowler, J. (1981). Stages of Faith: The Psychology of Human Development and the Quest for Meaning. Harper & Row.
Głaz, S. (2019). The Relationship of Forgiveness and Values with Meaning in Life of Polish Students. Journal of Religion and Health, 58(5), 1886–1907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-019-00860-4
Glock, C. Y., & Stark, R. (1966). Religion and Society in Tension. Rand McNally.
Hasbullah, R. (2021). Segregasi Sosial Berbasis Agama di Perkotaan: Studi Kasus di Depok. Pusat Studi Toleransi.
Hasyim, M. (2021). Indeks Kerukunan Umat Beragama di Kota Depok. Balitbang Kemenag RI.
Hidayat, A. (2022). Manipulasi Simbol Keagamaan dalam Politik Identitas. Paramadina.
Huber, S., & Huber, O. W. (2012). The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS). Religion, 3(3), 710–724.
Kementerian Agama RI. (2023). Laporan Tahunan Kehidupan Keagamaan di Indonesia. Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia.
Kimball, C. (2008). When Religion Becomes Evil. HarperOne.
Larsson, E. (2022). Cutting Up a Chicken with a Cow-Cleaver-Confucianism as a Religion in Japan’s Courts of Law. MDPI Religions, 13(247), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel13030247
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills. SAGE.
Madjid, N. (1998). Islam, Kemodernan, dan Keindonesiaan. Mizan.
Mahmudah, N. (2021). Pengaruh Tingkat Pendidikan terhadap Toleransi Keagamaan di Depok. Jurnal Sosiologi Agama, 9(2), 111–130.
Maku, H., Tanggang, A., Maria, J. G., & Dopo, J. P. Z. (2024). Cak Nur Pluralism: Criticism Of The Phenomenon Religious Intolerance In Indonesia. International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS), 3(4). https://doi.org/10.55227/ijhess.v3i4.803
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. SAGE.
Nuraini, L. (2022). Makna Toleransi dalam Perspektif Muslim Kota Depok. Jurnal Multikulturalisme, 5(1), 22–34.
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48–63.
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569.
Putnam, R. D., & Campbell, D. E. (2010). American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. Simon & Schuster.
Rachmawati, T. (2022). Kesenjangan Toleransi di Masyarakat Muslim Depok. Jurnal Keislaman Dan Masyarakat, 6(2), 99–115.
Rahardjo, D. (2019). Tokoh Agama dan Moderasi Islam. Pusat Studi Keagamaan dan Perdamaian.
Rahmatulla, M. (2022). Dialektika Religiusitas dan Kerukunan Beragama di Jawa Barat. Litbang Kemenag RI.
Rizal, M. (2021). Radikalisme di Dunia Maya: Studi Konten Keagamaan di Media Sosial. Pusat Studi Islam dan Masyarakat.
Sabri, M. (2019). Religiusitas dan Sikap Toleransi Beragama. Pilar Pustaka.
Setara Institute. (2022). Laporan Tahunan: Indeks Kota Toleran. Setara Institute.
Shenton, A. K. (2024). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63–75.
Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., & Larkin, M. (2022). Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis: Theory, Method and Research. SAGE.
Suherman, A. (2021). Kedewasaan Beragama dalam Psikologi Islam. UIN Press.
Wahid, A. (1999). Islam dan Pluralisme: Keterbukaan dalam Tradisi. Wahid Foundation.
Wibowo, R. (2022). Kebingungan Religius Mahasiswa Muslim: Studi di Tiga Kampus di Depok. Jurnal Psikologi Agama, 10(1), 44–58.
Wulff, D. M. (1997). Psychology of Religion: Classic and Contemporary (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muammar Zulfiqri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.